Cartledge is the rare academic historian who can write compellingly for both academic and popular audiences—another excellent Cartledgian contributiuon.
Alexander the Great
by
Philip Freeman
A lively, entertaining, and historically accurate new biography of Alexander, with new insights into the Macedonian world that shaped him.
Parenti’s book is much damned by classical scholars who find this account to be unhistorical and poorly researched, but student reviewers generally like this passionate but arguably flawed reassessment of Caesar.
Grant tries to study Cleopatra by way of analyzing men like Antony and Caesar. Grant’s history is solid but student reviewers regularly contend that Grant spends too much time analyzing the men in Cleopatra’s life instead of Cleopatra herself.
Student reviewers have been routinely frustrated by Tyldesley’s unwillingness to construct arguments that do not contain the words “may have,” “might have,” and “possibly could.”
Student reviewers have been routinely frustrated by Tyldesley’s unwillingness to construct arguments that do not contain the words “may have,” “might have,” and “possibly could.” Please keep in mind that little is known about Nefertiti and student reviewers routinely object to Tyldesley’s examination of male historical figures.